Saturday, February 5, 2011

Claire McCaskill Purposely Steers Jobs Away From Missouri. TEA Party Reacts.

Claire actually lobbied the White House to keep the DNC out of St Louis. This cost the city thousands of jobs and millions of dollars. Thanx Claire Bear.


  1. ahahaha really? really? I started to type something of substance but i stopped. Its not worth it, You Teabaggers are fucking retarded racists shit heads Thats it. so fuckkkkking stupid, just so stupid. probably the most stupid political platform in americas history, Just so fucking stupid. Just so dumb.

  2. Aw. You're just jealous.


  3. @Anonymous. You obviously have a very limited vocabulary. If you would take time to study the issues your vocabulary would expand and you would be a more informed person. You were asked to be nice and you were not. My guess is you a person of low moral standing. My name is Michael J. Lauck and I don't hide behind anonymous.

  4. Say No to Claire in 2012
    The 2008 Democratic convention in Denver generated $266 million in regional economic benefit and brought in 50000 people according to Denver officials. Even though bringing the Democrat National Convention to St. Louis would be an economic boom to the region Senator Claire McCaskill lobbied against bringing the convention here, because it would hurt her reelection effort. It is one thing to sit silently by and hope the Convention does not come to St. Louis, because of the perceived threat that it may hurt your campaign, but it is reprehensible as a sitting Senator to actively lobby against the Convention, which brings an economic benefit to the region. Of course, Claire denies that she lobbied against bringing the DNC Convention to St. Louis.

    Nevertheless Jeff Zeleny of the New York Times contradicts McCaskill’s denial and reported the following: “Ms. McCaskill, one of the president’s closest friends in the Senate, took her concerns directly to the White House, according to party leaders familiar with the selection process. She argued that her re-election could be complicated if the convention was held in St. Louis, because the Democratic gathering will almost certainly attract protesters and compete for fund-raising.”

    Who are we to believe? Should you believe Claire McCaskill or a New York Times reporter? A tough call, however, if you look into Claire’s past you may give the benefit of the doubt to the reporter. While investigating abuses at nursing homes, Claire McCaskill met a rich owner of one, dropped that investigation and eventually married him.

    Claire is out for Claire. She will do and say anything to stay in power. She will take both sides of an issue for political expediency, like she did with Obamacare. She voted for it when they needed the sixty votes, then voted against it when only a simple majority was needed for passage.

    As an elected official, you are supposed to be a representative for your constituents and do what is in the best interests of the people. Lobbying against a convention that would benefit the region economically is not in the best interests of the people. The citizens of Missouri do not need someone like Claire McCaskill, who puts her self interests ahead of the people to be their representative in the United States Senate, anymore. People of Missouri wake up and FIRE Claire McCaskill in 2012.


Be Nice!