Friday, April 29, 2011

UMSL Officials Attempt to Explain Away Labor Course's Violent Rhetoric.

The University of Missouri has been under fire recently as video has surfaced featuring two UM professors advocating violence, intimidation and industrial sabotage as forms of labor organizing. Those Videos Can Be seen at InsurgentVisuals.Com
After seeing the videos I set out to interview UMSL's Chancellor and ask him if he was aware of the issue and what he was going to do about it.

Here's What Happened.

15 comments:

  1. Amazing how they are so sure that video is a an untrustworthy medium where people can be edited to make it appear to say anything at all... yet they all know and like Michael Moore's videos!

    Definitely got his close up there - Educated!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice work, man. These people are unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your efforts and shining the light on these socialists.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LMAO, for EVERY video presented by Breitbart EVERY one has been shown to be highly edited and constructed for a specific assault on a 'social' issue but when the FULL video comes out totally DESTROYS the 'assault' the edited construction was designed to create...

    Keep trying Sharp, your attempts to make these administrators look bad will only make you look more desperate

    If you worked off consistent and factual info you could be respected, bottom line is you never have and with the direction you continue to maintain never will...

    Have a good day :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, this Rob guy comment (above) sounds like he may be a tad, smidge, tiny bit of a massive leftist douche. Adam, keep up the good work dude. Love it when the crazy left keep talking themselves into a corner.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Absolutely correct, I thoroughly enjoy when right wing folks name call, seems that's the first course of action to 'debate' on an issue they attempt to bring up

    All of Breitbart's videos have been shown to be edited, this is a fact, now another video is released and it's shown to be edited, this is pointed out and the right wing acts and talks AROUND that very key point, which only validates that it's not important to get it correct it's only important to stay on 'message'

    As the above poster proves out...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rob, you are clueless son, eat a bowl of dicks and take your whiny, bitchass liberal talking points back over to the dailykos.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not sure anyone is responding to Rob's concerns, and there is significant documentation to suggest that these (and other videos by Breitbart) are edited. Adam, can you offer a reason as to why your 'journalism' is again and again proved to be nothing be partisan dribble and manipulation?

    ReplyDelete
  9. There's usually no point in arguing with idiots, except to taunt them and or laugh at them, but when you can have the facts do both for you, might as well go for it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If the 'best' you have to offer in rebuttal is name calling and/or taunts you've already lost. You should already know that I'm intellectually taunting you, provoking you since it's pretty laughable for every reply I give NOBODY can offer a honest response

    I give you credit for playing but alas you just don't have the mental horsepower to step up and debate and discuss without throwing idiotic retorts that will make all the folks that follow the stuff here ask for more without hesitation

    Kudos for proving how intolerant and unwilling the right wing is and has always continued to be

    ReplyDelete
  11. When I hear BS like this, I always want to ask exactly what "context" would make these kinds of comments acceptable. Tom J

    ReplyDelete
  12. Rob, when you contacted the interviewees, and asked them directly what parts of the video are "altered"-----what did they say?

    ReplyDelete
  13. To speculate that the video is "probably altered" is wasted time.

    Prove it.

    Then we can talk.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Do you usually videotape people without their knowledge and consent? While that's not technically illegal via Missouri law, it certainly is unethical, to say the least.

    The media relations guy was well-spoken, and reasonable. Why should he comment on snippets, when he had not seen the full video? As it turns out, he was RIGHT--the videos were edited in a way to take things massively out of context. Go figure.

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ Anonymous "To speculate that the video is "probably altered" is wasted time. Prove it."

    My God do you not actually know what an edit is? The edits are there, plain as day. I'm glad I wasn't working that day and had to respond to your BS Right-Wing nut commando tactics. I'm not as patient as these folks. I'd have gotten down to brass tax and called you what you are which is a lying, manipulative brat looking to make a name for himself on the backs of others work. Walking around around with a video camera trying to put words into people's mouths is pathetic and transparent.

    ReplyDelete

Be Nice!